Re: pgpool versus sequences

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Please note also that what pgpool users have got right now is a time
>> bomb, which is not better than immediately-visible breakage. �I would
>> prefer to try to get this change out ahead of widespread adoption of the
>> broken pgpool version.

> Hmm, I gather from what Tatsuo is saying at the web site that this has
> only been broken since the release of 3.0 on February 23rd, so given
> that I think your approach makes sense.

Done, and I also installed a kluge to clean up the damage retroactively
during any nextval/setval operation.
        regards, tom lane