Re: buildfarm failure in XML code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: buildfarm failure in XML code
Дата
Msg-id 27378.1171638554@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: buildfarm failure in XML code  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: buildfarm failure in XML code
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Freitag, 16. Februar 2007 14:59 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
>> UX:acomp: ERROR: "xml.c", line 2188: undefined symbol: INT64_MAX
>> UX:acomp: ERROR: "xml.c", line 2188: undefined symbol: INT64_MIN
>> 
>> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=warthog&dt=2007-02-1
>> 6%2009:06:01

> It needs a rebuild after the fix.

This "fix" doesn't fix anything.  We have always in the past managed to
avoid assuming that int64 actually is available; I don't intend to give
the xml code a free pass to break that, especially for such an utterly
marginal purpose as this code has.  I'm also wondering why xml.c is the
only place anywhere in the code that uses <stdint.h>.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Seneca Cunningham
Дата:
Сообщение: Intermittent buildfarm failures due to timestamptz test
Следующее
От: Gregory Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Mail getting through? Short varlena headers