David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> We have a very unfortunate naming situation with Jeff Davis's new
> feature, namely the shorter name, which is one permutation away from
> an existing and entirely unrelated feature: Constraint Exclusion,
> which has to do with queries over partitioned tables and like
> entities.
> Renaming it, which I believe we should do Really Soon(TM), to Operator
> [Exclusion] Constraints would fix this problem.
Too late. I just spent about two days making that patch follow the
"exclusion constraints" naming, and I'm not undoing that work.
regards, tom lane