Re: psql & readline & win32
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql & readline & win32 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2734.1139853137@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: psql & readline & win32 (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql & readline & win32
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> What would we patch it with? I don't think anybody has found a problem
>> there, this is a separate file that you ship along with it.
> Well, the problem is that it handles backslash incorrectly. We could
> patch that in the readline source rather than playing with a
> configuaration file.
Do the readline developers agree that it's "incorrect"? I could see
shipping a patch as a short-term band-aid, but not if the patch isn't
going to be accepted upstream.
>> Even that may not be enough. This is the GPL we're talking about.
> At that point, psql becomes GPL, no question.
Which means it's not happening, no?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: