wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The other alternative that was discussed was to put the onus on
>> analyze.c to fix things up. Basically, we could make NOT DEFERRABLE
>> and the other subclauses of foreign key clauses be independent
>> clauses from the grammar's point of view; that is,
> Yepp, that was the third possible solution we talked about.
> No doubt that it is the best one, and something we both wanna
> see at the end. Only that I fear we cannot build it in time
> for 7.0 schedule.
Why not? It's not *that* much work --- looked like maybe an
evening's project to me. If no one else wants to do it, I will.
regards, tom lane