Re: WAL Rate Limiting
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WAL Rate Limiting |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 27195.1389886520@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WAL Rate Limiting (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WAL Rate Limiting
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I don't really see much difficulty in determining what's a utility
> command and what not for the purpose of this? All utility commands which
> create WAL in O(table_size) or worse.
By that definition, INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE can all be "utility
commands". So would a full-table-scan SELECT, if it's unfortunate
enough to run into a lot of hint-setting or HOT-pruning work.
I think possibly a more productive approach to this would be to treat
it as a session-level GUC setting, rather than hard-wiring it to affect
certain commands and not others.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: