Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Дата
Msg-id 26804.1392223183@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-02-12 11:26:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm.  So if we're giving up on the idea of ever getting rid of PGDLLIMPORT,
>> we ought to actually remove that, so that the Cygwin build works more like
>> the other Windows builds?

> Hm, I don't see a big advantage in detecting the errors as It won't
> hugely increase the buildfarm coverage. But --auto-import seems to
> require marking the .text sections as writable, avoiding that seems to
> be a good idea if we don't need it anymore.

Given the rather small number of Windows machines in the buildfarm,
I'd really like them all to be on the same page about what's valid
and what isn't.  Having to wait ~24 hours to find out if they're
all happy with something isn't my idea of a good time.  In any case,
as long as we have discrepancies between them, I'm not going to be
entirely convinced that any of them are telling the full truth.

I'm going to go remove that switch and see if brolga starts failing.
If it does, I'll be satisfied that we understand the issues here.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT