Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Дата
Msg-id 26517.1360016162@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> If the release notes are not already baked in, I would suggest this wording:

> +      The main consequence of this mistake is that it
> +      caused full-table vacuuming scans to occur much more frequently
> +      than intended.

It's baked ... sorry about that, but when making the notes there's
seldom time to go through the threads about every patch to see if the
commit messages are accurate or not.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: split rm_name and rm_desc out of rmgr.c