Re: do we need to postpone beta4?

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> So now we have the following issues remaining:

> * page corruption after moving tablespace
> * ExplainOnePlan handles snapshots differently than ProcessQuery
> * name and comment of XLogSetAsyncCommitLSN() should be changed
> * Documentation fails to build as PDF

> ...and I wouldn't necessarily regard any of those as forcing another
> beta; the first two are ancient, the third is cosmetic, and the last
> one is a build system issue rather than a code change.

> Obviously, it's too early to decide anything: we may yet discover more
> issues that need to be addressed.  But I think we're in much better
> shape than it seemed 24 hours ago.

Yeah.  I'm off poking at the "incorrect FTS result" problem, but that
is a pre-existing bug as well; it goes back at least to 8.4 and probably
further.
        regards, tom lane