Re: vacuum, dead rows, usual solutions didn't help

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: vacuum, dead rows, usual solutions didn't help
Дата
Msg-id 26463.1199946384@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на vacuum, dead rows, usual solutions didn't help  (Gábor Farkas <gabor@nekomancer.net>)
Ответы Re: vacuum, dead rows, usual solutions didn't help  (Gábor Farkas <gabor@nekomancer.net>)
Список pgsql-general
=?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor?= Farkas <gabor@nekomancer.net> writes:
> basically, the problem is this part of the vacuum-output:

> INFO:  "sessions": found 2 removable, 6157654 nonremovable row versions
> in 478069 pages
> DETAIL:  6155746 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.

The problem is that you've got some old open transactions that could
potentially see those recently-dead rows, so VACUUM can't remove the
rows without breaking MVCC rules for those transactions.

Find the clients that are holding open transactions, and zap 'em.

> previously we were running this application with postgresql-7.4, and
> there the vacuuming worked fine. now we migrated this to
> postgresql-8.2.4, and it does not want to vacuum it properly.

I wonder whether you updated the client-side support libraries?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gábor Farkas
Дата:
Сообщение: vacuum, dead rows, usual solutions didn't help
Следующее
От: Ken Johanson
Дата:
Сообщение: Query to get column-names in table via PG tables?