Re: pg_dump and sequences - RFC
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump and sequences - RFC |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26047.970154256@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and sequences - RFC (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump and sequences - RFC
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
> At 11:01 28/09/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A data-only reload
>> would fail to make that guarantee unless you drop and recreate
>> the sequence.
> Will this cause problems in an existing database because the sequence OID
> changes?
Hmm, good point. There isn't any real easy way to refer to a sequence
by OID --- the sequence functions only accept names --- but I suppose
someone out there might be doing something with sequence OIDs.
Perhaps the real answer is to extend the set of sequence functions so
that it's possible to set/clear is_called directly. Perhaps a variant
setval() with an additional, boolean argument?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: