Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25913.1544821903@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added (Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com> writes:
> I would be interested if you have an example where the ability of
> date/timestamp values to be infinite adds special case coding.
I think Robert is talking about the implementation functions for
timestamp-related operations, which typically do have to special-case
infinite inputs. I take your point that there might be fewer special
cases in the calling SQL code, though.
> The wart I'm worried about is subtraction of infinite dates. Right now
> dates subtract to give integers; and there are no infinite integers. All
> the clever solutions to this I have right now involve making highly
> backward-incompatible changes.
As far as that goes, I'm content to say that infinity is outside the
domain of type date. If you need infinities, use timestamp.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: