Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign)

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> So, what should we do?  Should we go another month or two and just wait
> until we have enough must-have features?  While not waiting on specific
> features, it _is_ waiting for something to warrant a release.  I guess
> the big question is whether we release on a scheduled-basis or a
> enough-features-basis.

"Enough features" is such a judgment call that no one can predict what
the schedule will be, if that's part of the decision.

I had been leaning to May 1 beta, but am happy to switch to June 1 if
you feel that makes an improvement in the odds of completing the Windows
port.  (I think it will also improve the odds of finishing this protocol
stuff I've taken on...)  I don't want to see it pushed further than that
without good concrete arguments for doing so.
        regards, tom lane