Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans
Дата
Msg-id 25659.1585542569@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 8:02 PM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm curious if Tom's objection is mostly on the grounds that we should
>> be consistent in what's displayed, or that he thinks the information
>> is likely to be useless.

> Yeah, it would be good if he clarifies his position.

Some of both: it seems like these ought to be consistent, and the
lack of complaints so far about regular index-only scans suggests
that people don't need the info.  But perhaps we ought to add
similar info in both places.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: snapper vs. HEAD
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?