Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On May 31, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I was going to propose ==> across the board.

> What about -> ?

hstore already uses that for something else.

Robert's idea isn't a bad one if we're forced to rename the operator.
I'd still like to know exactly how hard the concrete has set on the
SQL spec draft, first.  (Peter?)
        regards, tom lane