Re: Dump/Restore of non-default PKs
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Dump/Restore of non-default PKs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2379840.1650314887@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Dump/Restore of non-default PKs ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Dump/Restore of non-default PKs
Re: Dump/Restore of non-default PKs Re: Dump/Restore of non-default PKs |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 1:00 PM Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
> wrote:
>> I propose that we change pg_dump so that when it creates a PK it does
>> so in 2 commands:
>> 1. CREATE [UNIQUE] INDEX iname ...
>> 2. ALTER TABLE .. ADD PRIMARY KEY USING INDEX iname;
> Why not just get rid of the limitation that constraint definitions don't
> support non-default methods?
That approach would be doubling down on the assumption that we can always
shoehorn more custom options into SQL-standard constraint clauses, and
we'll never fall foul of shift/reduce problems or future spec additions.
I think for example that USING INDEX TABLESPACE is a blot on humanity,
and I'd be very glad to see pg_dump stop using it in favor of doing
things as Simon suggests.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: