Re: temporary tables are logged somehow?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: temporary tables are logged somehow? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23653.1421941466@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: temporary tables are logged somehow? (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: temporary tables are logged somehow?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Andrey Lizenko <lizenko79@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 3. They are not WAL-logged.
>> Whats wrong with it in my case?
> Nothing. Temporary tables are not WAL-logged, but transaction commit is.
Right. I think there is some optimization for transactions that only
wrote temp-table data, but it could at most be skipping fsync of the
transaction commit record, not omitting generating it entirely.
Also, changes to the system catalogs are always WAL-logged; so creation
and deletion of a temp table cause some amount of WAL output, even if
manipulation of the table's contents does not.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: