Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Btw, I played with this some more on Saturday and I think, while definitely a
> bad bug, the actual consequences aren't as bad as at least I initially feared.
> Fake relcache entries are currently set in 3 scenarios during recovery:
> 1. removal of ALL_VISIBLE in heapam.c
> 2. incomplete splits and incomplete deletions in nbtxlog.c
> 3. incomplete splits in ginxlog.c
> [ #1 doesn't really hurt in 9.1, and the others are low probability ]
OK, that explains why we've not seen a blizzard of trouble reports.
Still seems like a good idea to fix it ASAP, though.
regards, tom lane