Re: pg_arch.c call to sleep()
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_arch.c call to sleep() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23379.1099855700@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pg_arch.c call to sleep() (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_arch.c call to sleep()
Re: pg_arch.c call to sleep() |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> We have the following warning on Windows:
> pgarch.c:349: warning: implicit declaration of function `sleep'
> To fix it we could include the right header (which appears to be
> <stdlib.h> in the Windows/Mingw case), or we could replace the call by a
> call to pg_usleep().
<stdlib.h> is included automatically by c.h, so that surely won't fix it.
I have some recollection that we invented pg_usleep in part because we
wanted to not use sleep() at all in the backend, but I don't recall why
(and the reasoning might not apply to the archiver process, anyway).
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: