Re: Faster NUMERIC implementation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Faster NUMERIC implementation
Дата
Msg-id 23017.1048171770@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Faster NUMERIC implementation  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: Faster NUMERIC implementation  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> But I wonder if we could arrange things so the Numeric stuff wents out
> of the backend.

With suitable #define hacking you could perhaps take care of the code's
dependencies on palloc/pfree ... but elog is harder, and I don't see any
realistic way to handle the backend's function-call conventions as
opposed to conventions that would make sense as a library API.

I don't want to clutter the code by having to support two sets of error
conventions and two APIs.  If you can figure a way around that, great...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Philip Warner
Дата:
Сообщение: Varchar Vs. Text index matching - why different?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: string || NULL ambiguity