Surely this code in setrefs.c is wrong?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Surely this code in setrefs.c is wrong? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2277537.1694301772@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Surely this code in setrefs.c is wrong?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I happened to notice this bit in fix_expr_common's processing
of ScalarArrayOpExprs:
set_sa_opfuncid(saop);
record_plan_function_dependency(root, saop->opfuncid);
if (!OidIsValid(saop->hashfuncid))
record_plan_function_dependency(root, saop->hashfuncid);
if (!OidIsValid(saop->negfuncid))
record_plan_function_dependency(root, saop->negfuncid);
Surely those if-conditions are exactly backward, and we should be
recording nonzero hashfuncid and negfuncid entries, not zero ones.
As-is, the code's a no-op because record_plan_function_dependency
will ignore OIDs less than FirstUnpinnedObjectId, including zero.
"git blame" blames 50e17ad28 and 29f45e299 for these, so v14
has only half the problem of later branches.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: