Re: Performance degradation in 324577f39bc8738ed0ec24c36c5cb2c2f81ec660

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Performance degradation in 324577f39bc8738ed0ec24c36c5cb2c2f81ec660
Дата
Msg-id
22483.1412690194@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Performance degradation in 324577f39bc8738ed0ec24c36c5cb2c2f81ec660 Vladimir Kamarzin <vvk@vvk.pp.ru>
Re: Performance degradation in 324577f39bc8738ed0ec24c36c5cb2c2f81ec660 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Performance degradation in 324577f39bc8738ed0ec24c36c5cb2c2f81ec660 Vladimir Kamarzin <vvk@vvk.pp.ru>
Vladimir Kamarzin  writes:
> After upgrade from 9.3.1 to 9.3.5 we expirienced a slight performance degradation of all queries. Query time increased to some amount of ms, mostly in range of 100ms. Some actions in our application results in a lot of small queries and in such cases performance degradation is very significant - total action performs for a 2-3 times longer then before (15s -> 40s, etc).
> Using git-bisect we've found a bad revision causes performance drop: it is 324577f39bc8738ed0ec24c36c5cb2c2f81ec660

Hm.  If you're going to do queries that involve update/delete across large
inheritance trees, that bug fix is unavoidably going to cost you some
cycles.  Having said that, though, the append_rel_list data structures
aren't especially large or complex, so it's a mite astonishing that you
could notice this extra copying cost in the context of everything else
that happens in a large inherited UPDATE.  I am wondering if you've
misidentified the commit that made the difference --- especially since you
claim there's a penalty for "all" queries, which there manifestly couldn't
be with this particular patch.  If not, there must be something rather
unusual about your queries or schema.  Care to provide a self-contained
test case?

			regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Vladimir Kamarzin
Дата:
От: George Neuner
Дата:
Сообщение: help: function failing
FAQ