Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2174975.1651602203@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-05-03 01:16:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Irritatingly, it doesn't reproduce (at least not easily) in a manual
>> build on the same box.
> Odd, given how readily it seem to reproduce on the bf. I assume you built with
>> Uses -fsanitize=alignment -DWRITE_READ_PARSE_PLAN_TREES -DSTRESS_SORT_INT_MIN
-DENFORCE_REGRESSION_TEST_NAME_RESTRICTIONS
Yeah, I copied all that stuff ...
>> So it's almost surely a timing issue, and your theory here seems plausible.
> Unfortunately I don't think my theory holds, because I actually had added a
> defense against this into the test that I forgot about momentarily...
Oh, hm. I can try harder to repro it.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: