"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> That doesn't seem like enough to guarantee that you've got the right
>> function.
> As Tim said elsewhere:
>> I don't see either of those as significant issues: "If you need more
>> control for a particular SP then don't use SP::* to call that SP."
If the thing actively fails when there's more than one possible match,
that might be ok. Randomly choosing a match, not so much.
regards, tom lane