Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 21381.1175696548@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Right -- IMHO what we should be doing is reject any input to chr() which
> is beyond plain ASCII (or maybe > 255), and create a separate function
> (unicode_char() sounds good) to get an Unicode character from a code
> point, converted to the local client_encoding per conversion_procs.
Hm, I hadn't thought of that approach, but another idea is that the
argument of chr() is *always* a unicode code point, and it converts
to the current encoding. Do we really need a separate function?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: