Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Kurt Harriman <harriman@acm.org> wrote:
>> Revised patch is attached (4th edition).

> This looks generally sane to me, though it seems entirely imaginable
> that it might break something, somewhere, for somebody... in which
> case I suppose we'll adjust as needed.

Looks sane to me too -- committed.  We'll soon see what the buildfarm
thinks (though the number of non-gcc buildfarm members is depressingly
small).
        regards, tom lane