Re: Bug in numeric multiplication

Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> On 21 September 2015 at 16:09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> After trying to rework the comment to explain what maxdig really meant
>> after your changes, I came to the conclusion that it'd be better to do
>> it as per attached.  Does this look sane to you?

> Yes that looks better. It's still the same amount of extra headroom
> (21), but I think it's clearer your way.

OK, pushed (after further hacking on the comment ...)
        regards, tom lane