Re: [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20879.1464379984@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into
src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Nikolay Shaplov wrote:
>> Story start from the point that I found out that a.m. can not forbid changing
>> some of it's reloptions with ALTER INDEX command.
> Hmm, this sounds like a bug to me. In BRIN, if you change the
> pages_per_range option for an existing index, the current index
> continues to work because the value used during the last index build is
> stored in the metapage. Only when you reindex after changing the option
> the new value takes effect.
> I think Bloom should do likewise.
AFAICT, Bloom *does* do that. The reloptions are only consulted directly
while initializing the metapage.
I think Nikolay's complaint is essentially that there should be a way
for an AM to forbid ALTER INDEX if it's not going to support on-the-fly
changes of a given reloption. That might be a helpful usability
improvement, but it's only a usability improvement not a bug fix.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: