Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
Дата
Msg-id 2081.1151000717@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Ответы Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions  ("Bort, Paul" <pbort@tmwsystems.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>>> item #2: Is dllinit.c GPL code?

> I don't think it's needed on Win32. It's not included in my VC++ build,
> because I forgot it :-), and it works just fine.
> The point is that as long as we don't do anything in it (which we
> don't), the runtime supplied default should be just fine.
> I can't speak for cygwin, just standard win32.

The part of it that seems not to be a no-op is

#ifdef __CYGWIN____hDllInstance_base = hInst;
#endif   /* __CYGWIN__ */

#ifdef __CYGWIN___impure_ptr = __imp_reent_data;
#endif

and the whole thing is wrapped in

#if CYGWIN_VERSION_DLL_MAJOR < 1001

so presumably this is only needed for old Cygwin versions.  Can anyone
say how old "1001" is and whether we still ought to care about it?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Diogo Biazus"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: xlog viewer proposal
Следующее
От: Rod Taylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC