Re: Inner Join of the same table
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Inner Join of the same table |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20384.1155676382@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Inner Join of the same table (Sebastián Baioni <sebaioni-postgresql@yahoo.com.ar>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Inner Join of the same table
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
=?iso-8859-1?q?Sebasti=E1n=20Baioni?= <sebaioni-postgresql@yahoo.com.ar> writes:
> 8 -> GroupAggregate (cost=0.00..37348395.05 rows=3951 width=25) (actual
> time=130.000..2629617.000 rows=254576 loops=1)
> 9 -> Index Scan using uesapt001 on APORTES (cost=0.00..37301678.64
> rows=9339331 width=25) (actual time=110.000..2520690.000 rows=9335892 loops=1)
Given the relatively small estimated number of group rows, I'd have
expected the thing to use a seqscan and HashAggregate for this part.
Do you have enable_hashagg turned off for some reason? Or enable_seqscan?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: