On 2024-May-09, Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> With RECREATE TABLE, one day, we would be probably have RECREATE TABLE
> CONCURRENTLY implemented, making pg_repack less needed.
If we really wanted to rename VACUUM FULL, I would go for a name that
betrays its CLUSTER implementation -- maybe CLUSTER UNSORTED or so --
and document it together with regular CLUSTER. We don't really need a
new top-level command for it IMO.
As for pg_repack, I'd much rather get VACUUM SQUEEZE using pg_squeeze as
an implementation starting point (without the scheduling stuff though.)
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/