Hi,
On 2022-08-23 13:28:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I agree with the upthread comments that we only need/want to catch
> foreseeable incorrect-input errors, and that the way to make that
> happen is to refactor the related type input functions, and that
> a lot of the heavy lifting for that has been done already.
I think it's a good direction to go in. What of the heavy lifting for that has
been done already? I'd have guessed that the hard part is to add different,
optional, type input, type coercion signatures, and then converting a lot of
types to that?
Greetings,
Andres Freund