Re: static libpq (and other libraries) overwritten on aix

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Noah Misch
Тема Re: static libpq (and other libraries) overwritten on aix
Дата
Msg-id 20220818045929.GB410601@rfd.leadboat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на static libpq (and other libraries) overwritten on aix  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: static libpq (and other libraries) overwritten on aix  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: static libpq (and other libraries) overwritten on aix  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
The AIX sections of Makefile.shlib misuse the terms "static" and "shared".
Imagine s/static library/library ending in .a/ and s/shared library/library
ending in .so/.  That yields an accurate description of the makefile rules.

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:01:54PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Two questions:
> 1) Do we continue building static libraries for libpq etc?

Essentially, we don't build static libpq today, and we should continue not
building it.  (The first-built libpq.a is static, but that file is an
implementation detail of the makefile rules.  The surviving libpq.a is a
normal AIX shared library.)

> 2) Do we care about static libraries not suriving on AIX?

No.

>    There could also be
>    a race in the buildrules leading to sometimes static libs sometimes shared
>    libs winning, I think.

Not since commit e8564ef, to my knowledge.


Along the lines of Robert's comment, it could be a nice code beautification to
use a different suffix for the short-lived .a file.  Perhaps _so_inputs.a.

I found this useful years ago:
https://web.archive.org/web/20151003130212/http://seriousbirder.com/blogs/aix-shared-and-static-libraries-explained/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Clarify the comments about varlena header encoding
Следующее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: shadow variables - pg15 edition