Hi,
On 2022-04-05 08:46:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 11:53:03AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > It seems $subject would have a chance of catching some of these bugs, as well
> > as exposing amcheck to a database with a bit more varied content?
>
> Makes sense to me to extend that.
>
> > Depending on the cost it might make sense to do this optionally, via
> > PG_TEST_EXTRA?
>
> Yes, it would be good to check the difference in run-time before
> introducing more. A logical dump of the regression database is no
> more than 15MB if I recall correctly, so my guess is that most of the
> runtime is still going to be eaten by the run of pg_regress.
On my workstation it takes about 2.39s to run pg_amcheck on a regression
database with all thoroughness options enabled. With -j4 it's 0.62s.
Without more thorough checking it's 1.24s and 0.30s with -j4.
Greetings,
Andres Freund