At Thu, 17 Feb 2022 04:32:26 +0000, "kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote in
> > I understood here as removing following mechanism from core:
> >
> > * disable timeout at end of tx.
>
> While reading again and this part might be wrong.
> Sorry for inconvenience.
> But anyway some codes should be (re)moved from core, right?
I think we just don't need to add the special timeout kind to the
core. postgres_fdw can use USER_TIMEOUT and it would be suffiction to
keep running health checking regardless of transaction state then fire
query cancel if disconnection happens. As I said in the previous main,
possible extra query cancel woud be safe.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center