On 2022-02-13 12:36:13 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Actually, I'm working on simplifying and improving radix tree
> implementation for PG16 dev cycle. From the discussion so far I think
> it's better to have a data structure that can be used for
> general-purpose and is also good for storing TID, not very specific to
> store TID. So I think radix tree would be a potent candidate. I have
> done the insertion and search implementation.
Awesome!