Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

Hi,

On 2022-02-11 13:47:01 +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> Today I noticed the inefficiencies of our dead tuple storage once
> again, and started theorizing about a better storage method; which is
> when I remembered that this thread exists, and that this thread
> already has amazing results.
> 
> Are there any plans to get the results of this thread from PoC to committable?

I'm not currently planning to work on it personally. It'd would be awesome if
somebody did...

Greetings,

Andres Freund