Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

Greetings,

* Daniel Gustafsson (daniel@yesql.se) wrote:
> > On 3 Feb 2022, at 15:07, Peter Eisentraut  wrote:
> > 
> > On 28.01.22 15:30, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> I would really, really like to have an alternative to OpenSSL for PG.
> > 
> > What are the reasons people want that?  With OpenSSL 3, the main reasons -- license and FIPS support -- have gone away.
> 
> At least it will go away when OpenSSL 3 is FIPS certified, which is yet to
> happen (submitted, not processed).
> 
> I see quite a few valid reasons to want an alternative, a few off the top of my
> head include:
> 
> - Using trust stores like Keychain on macOS with Secure Transport.  There is
> AFAIK something similar on Windows and NSS has it's certificate databases.
> Especially on client side libpq it would be quite nice to integrate with where
> certificates already are rather than rely on files on disks.
> 
> - Not having to install OpenSSL, Schannel and Secure Transport would make life
> easier for packagers.
> 
> - Simply having an alternative.  The OpenSSL projects recent venture into
> writing transport protocols have made a lot of people worried over their
> bandwidth for fixing and supporting core features.
> 
> Just my $0.02, everyones mileage varies on these.

Yeah, agreed on all of these.

Thanks,

Stephen