Agree to the motive and +1 for the concept.
At Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:00:13 +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> wrote in
> However, the patch adds:
>
> > +typedef struct Null
> > +{
> > + NodeTag type;
> > + char *val;
> > +} Null;
>
> which doesn't seem to be used anywhere. Is that a leftoverf from an
> intermediate development stage?
+1 Looks like so, it can be simply removed.
0001 looks fine to me.
0002:
there's an "integer Value node" in gram.y: 7776.
- n = makeFloatConst(v->val.str, location);
+ n = (Node *) makeFloatConst(castNode(Float, v)->val, location);
makeFloatConst is Node* so the cast doesn't seem needed. The same can
be said for Int and String Consts. This looks like a confustion with
makeInteger and friends.
+ else if (IsA(obj, Integer))
+ _outInteger(str, (Integer *) obj);
+ else if (IsA(obj, Float))
+ _outFloat(str, (Float *) obj);
I felt that the type enames are a bit confusing as they might be too
generic, or too close with the corresponding binary types.
- Node *arg; /* a (Value *) or a (TypeName *) */
+ Node *arg;
Mmm. It's a bit pity that we lose the generic name for the value nodes.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center