> Thanks for working on that. I had a look and wondered if it might be
> better to go into slightly less details about the exact atomic
> function to use. The wording there might lead you to believe you can
> just call the atomic function on the non-atomic variable.
>
> It might be best just to leave the details about how exactly to use
> atomics by just referencing port/atomics.h.
>
> Maybe something like the attached?
Thanks. Agreed and your patch looks good to me.
> I'm also a bit on the fence if this should be backpatched or not. The
> reasons though maybe not is that it seems unlikely maybe people would
> not be working in master if they're developing something new. On the
> other side of the argument, 0ccebe779, which adjusts another README
> was backpatched. I'm leaning towards backpatching.
Me too. Let's backpatch.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp