Hi,
On 2021-05-11 10:57:03 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 8:52 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > ... If we did make the check support shared memory *and*
> > partitioned tables, I could easily see it be a win for things like
> > LockReleaseAll().
Errr, that's not even a shared hashtable... So it would help even if we
just excluded shared memory hashtables.
> For that case, has the idea of maintaining a dlist of local locks been
> considered?
Yea, there's been a long discussion on that for
LockReleaseAll(). Combined with alternatives around shrinking the hashtable...
Greetings,
Andres Freund