Re: SQL-standard function body

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 03:08:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> > Should we be okay releasing v14 without support for breaking function
> > dependency loops, or does that call for an open item?
> 
> Oh!  That should definitely be an open item.  It doesn't seem
> that hard to do something similar to what we do for views,
> i.e. create a dummy function and replace it later.

I added
https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=PostgreSQL_14_Open_Items&type=revision&diff=35926&oldid=35925