Re: Jsonpath ** vs lax mode

On 2021-Jan-21, Alexander Korotkov wrote:

> Requiring strict mode for ** is a solution, but probably too restrictive...
> 
> What do you think about making just subsequent accessor after ** not
> to unwrap arrays.  That would be a bit tricky to implement, but
> probably that would better satisfy the user needs.

Hmm, why is it too restrictive?  If the user needs to further drill into
the JSON, can't they chain json_path_query calls, specifying (or
defaulting to) lax mode for the part doesn't include the ** expression?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile