Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos
| От | Alvaro Herrera | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20200921190804.GA2817@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) | 
| Ответы | Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On 2020-Sep-21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oh wait, I forgot about the fmgrprotos.h discrepancy.
> 
> I wrote:
> > It strikes me that a low-cost workaround would be to rename these
> > C functions.  There's no law that their C names must match the
> > SQL names.
> 
> Here's a proposed patch to fix it that way.
pgtypes_numeric.h still contains
typedef struct
{
    int         ndigits;        /* number of digits in digits[] - can be 0! */
    int         weight;         /* weight of first digit */
    int         rscale;         /* result scale */
    int         dscale;         /* display scale */
    int         sign;           /* NUMERIC_POS, NUMERIC_NEG, or NUMERIC_NAN */
    NumericDigit *buf;          /* start of alloc'd space for digits[] */
    NumericDigit *digits;       /* decimal digits */
} numeric;
... isn't this more likely to create a typedef entry than merely a
function name?
-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: