Re: Documentation: 21.5. Default Roles

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 06:45:16PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 16:03, Bruce Momjian  wrote:
>     Usually when I apply "wording" doc patches to head only, someone
>     complains that it should be backpatched, so I did that in this case.  If
>     we want to change that idea, we need to agree on the criteria.
> 
> True, but it's not a wording patch, you're entirely renaming a feature.
> 
> I agree with the change of default to predefined, but it shouldn't be
> backpatched.
> 
> There should be a comment in there that it was previously known as "default
> roles", with indexed terms for both.

Well, I am renaming the documentation label for the feature.  Is that
different than wording?  I guess I can see that.  If everyone agrees I
can revert the backpatch, but I don't want to do that if other people
are going to say this should be backpatched.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +