Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'?
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'?
Дата
Msg-id
20191227193359.GA16605@momjian.us
Ответ на
Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? (Bruce Momjian)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? Eugen Konkov <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? Eugen Konkov <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? Eugen Konkov <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 08:33:28AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:15:17PM +0200, Eugen Konkov wrote: > > ! Specifying a missing bound as exclusive is automatically converted > > ! to inclusive, e.g., [,] is automatically converted > > ! to (,) > > > > Misspell? > > > > You say: > > exclusive is automatically converted to inclusive > > But then: > > [,] is automatically converted to (,) > > > > which one is correct? > > My mistake. Thanks for finding that. Updated patch attached, plus I > improved the second paragraph. Patch applied back through 9.4. Thank you for the feedback. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата: