Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?
Дата
Msg-id
20191223053434.GF34339@paquier.xyz
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>
Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Hi all, I was working on some stuff for table AMs, and I got to wonder it we had better rename amapi.h to indexam.h and amapi.c to indexam.c, so as things are more consistent with table AM. It is a bit annoying to name the files dedicated to index AMs with what looks like now a too generic name. That would require switching a couple of header files for existing module developers, which is always annoying, but the move makes sense thinking long-term? Any thoughts? -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления