On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:56:33PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I suppose it should something other than partition(ed), since partitions can be
> partitioned, too...
>
> Attaching a partition acquires a <literal>SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE</literal>
> lock on the parent table, in addition to
> <literal>ACCESS EXCLUSIVE</literal> locks on the child table and the
> <literal>DEFAULT</literal> partition (if any).
In this context, "on the child table" sounds a bit confusing? Would
it make more sense to say the "on the table to be attached" instead?
--
Michael