Hi,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:32:53 -0400
Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 10:50 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > For you information, Ken Gaillot adviced me to file a bug on the RH bug
> > tracker
> > system. So here it is:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718201
>
> I committed the fix that is mentioned here:
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgrpms.git;a=commit;h=b94a8ca9b0c9fffb0d9d230161f1b4a0da8b60d3
>
> I am not releasing the updated packages, until I get some feedback from some
> people.
Well, I'm really on the fence in regard with this fix. PGDG packages are not
hotfixes :/
In the past, PGDG repo was requiring to exclude some distro packages to work
correctly. Maybe the best fix for RHEL 8 is to require to disable the
postgresql module ?
Moreover, I believe the best plan is in fact to provide modules from the pgdg
repo itself. But this is a total different story, much bigger project
altogether.
> I tested this on RHEL 6,7,8 and Fedora 29,30 . RHEL 6 and 7 did not
> complain, which is good.
normal, they are probably ignoring this parameter as it is related to modules.
EL 6 and 7 are not aware of modules.