Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Andres Freund
Тема
Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ?
Дата
Msg-id
20190129165137.ow37yv4squc5s5d3@alap3.anarazel.de
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Hi,

On 2019-01-29 10:31:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera  writes:
> > On 2019-Jan-28, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I do like planner/pathnodes.h as a name, FWIW.
> 
> Yeah, I think I'll go with pathnodes.h.  We'd probably keep using that
> for the Path node typedefs themselves, even if somebody comes up with
> a design for splitting out other things.

+1

FWIW, I can live with the #ifndef, #define, typedef .. #endif thing, I
just don't think it's pretty.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Marko Tiikkaja
Дата:
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
FAQ